Soc. Inequality

This is the category for student responses to videos or class activities.

The Equality of Man and the Palestinian-Israeli Conflict: Twitter Speaks Truth to Power

If you go to NBC, CBS, ABC, or FOX you will get a familiar narrative:  Israelis minding their own business being attacked by Palestinian fanatics.

But this is not true.

If you want to know the real deal about the Palestinian-Israeli conflict, you need to turn to new media.  It is only on platforms like Twitter where a narrative can be developed that explains what is really going on in Palestine (or, alternative news sources like Democracy Now or The Young Turks).

In fact, what is really happening is that every second of every day Palestinians are being oppressed, and the start of this recent  conflict – the rockets from Gaza into Israeli held territories – is just symptomatic of a perpetual difference in power relations.  The ineffectual rockets from Palestine and the Israeli response is like the POW in the concentration camp being beaten for attacking a guard – the guards will maliciously attack the POW ostensibly in self-defense, but they themselves are the reason why the violence began in the first place.  We should not take pity on the guard who beats the POW into submission – our sympathies should lie with the POW.  Similarly, our allegiance as Americans should lie with the Palestinian who has spent most of his life in oppression.

I use oppressed here purposefully, as it goes beyond racism in everyday actions or discrimination in government, schools, and other institutions.  Oppression  is qualitatively different than those terms sociologists bandy about (sometimes too haphazardly in my opinion).  Blacks in the United States, for example, face a mild (but real) form of racism because their world is a world of whiteness and they must live in it. This is, in my opinion, mild within a broader socio-historical context.  Americans value equality of opportunity, and have put legal measures in place to blunt the effects of what can be called “symbolic racism”, and equalize the opportunities of different racial groups.

Indeed, the arguments between Democrats and Republicans over affirmative action and other race-based policy measures are essentially arguments over whether or not the measure is about equality of outcome (Democrats are OK with this, Republicans abhor it) or equality of opportunity (both parties support these measures).  When Republicans believe a policy is more about equalizing outcomes instead of opportunities, it is understood to be unfair – creating an unfair opportunity structure that favors minorities over whites.  Republicans then, with some justification, cart out the term “reverse discrimination”.  I’m digressing, but it is worth taking a moment and applaud the US for even considering these measures and trying their best to implement them.  On some level, they point to the core American belief (the uniquely American belief) that all people are created equal – under God or the constitution, take your pick.  The interpretation of this universal belief is what is generally under debate here in the US – but crucially, not the belief itself.

This is not the case in Israel.  I don’t know anything about Israeli law, but I can safely assume that there are few laws in place that are meant to equalize the life opportunities of Palestinians and Israelis.  Indeed, why would Israeli law makers even consider putting such measures in place?  There is no foundational belief in the fundamental equality between them and the Palestinians.  And this is why Palestinians can be described as being oppressed.  They are seen as categorically unequal, and the state supports that inequality.

For many years, the American public was not aware of the categorical inequality of blacks.  It was at best a vague notion for most.  For some, it was even (mis)understood that blacks were happy with their place in American society.  It took the evening news, and images of blacks being beaten and attacked by dogs, to stir the American public.  At that time the media could show those images and tell that story because the villains in that story were not owned or  bankrolled by them.


The "old media" covered the confrontation between Eugene "Bull" Connor and civil rights protestors (in this picture it is Walter Gadsden).  That coverage led to changes in national sentiment, leading to fundamental changes in American society.  The "old media" cannot cover events in this way anymore.

The “old media” covered the confrontation between Eugene “Bull” Connor and civil rights protesters (in this picture it is Walter Gadsden). That coverage led to changes in national sentiment, leading to fundamental changes in American society. The “old media” cannot cover events in this way any more.


What Computer Networking has to do with Boko Haram

The Islamic sect Boko Haram and their leader Abubakar Shekau are all over the news. The terrorist group from Northern Nigeria has been active at least since 2009.  Most recently the group has garnered international attention after it abducted 230 schoolgirls on April 16th.  Only 43 have escaped.  Nigerians have been very vocal, protesting their government’s lack of effectiveness in finding the schoolgirls and subduing Boko Haram.

In reading news clipping from this story, I realized that what we see happening in Nigeria is one particular example of a phenomenon that will in all likelihood be repeated globally over the next several years.  There will be more attacks from terrorist groups.  There will be more bombings.  There will be more abductions.  And it is not because of Islam.  It is because of what computer networks have done to societies in the 21st century.